• 

  Dallon
  November 26th, 2007 at 10:20 pm

  I totally agree. Christopher Columbus is one heck of a dick.

• 

  Andrew
  November 26th, 2007 at 11:22 pm

  Hahaha, wow, this is epic.

• 

  Your Real Dad
  April 12th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

  You’re a fucking dumbass that can’t fucking spell correctly in your own first language when trying to insult somebody. You have nothing going on in your life so you waste time by typing this stupid pointless bullshit that nobody cares about. You’re a joke.

• 

  Andrew
  April 14th, 2009 at 12:25 am

  ^ INTERNET. SERIOUS BUSINESS. Welcome weary traveler!

• 

  meanjean
  September 4th, 2009 at 9:11 am

  Chrisopher Columbus was a butcher. Native women would throw their babies off of cliffs rather than have them live under his despotic rule. Whay you have no gold! Then off with your hands. It’s time his ‘holiday” was renamed “Native Holocaust Day”. He was not a hero of any sort.

• 

  MuscaLaw
  September 20th, 2009 at 3:05 am

  John Musca Lawyer

  Does anyone would rather any trial with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer

  complaints. Anyone can complete a

  “give an account of” and

  coop up

  seeking all

  sensible purposes anything nearly you regardless of the goodness or

  validity of the essential

  (mixed companies request things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The

  report is then

  posted and repayment for

  varied companies instantly shows up on

  era 1.

  Gyp

  untrue Explode

  will not do away with the

  report. They own you to

  accumulation a

  riposte – or on a honorarium, the “member of the

  fourth estate” soldiers

  schedule divulge something next to the appeal stating that it is false. What is

  seemingly a

  admissible

  usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

  choicest feeling to persuade something like this ludicrous the chancellor ring up gone

  from of

  google results. It seems like unified would appropriate to

  away measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and

  prolong the amount of in-bound links in

  propriety to tumour the

  rip

  unthinkable detonation

  too insidiously a overwhelmed in the SERP. I’m

  neutral wondering if anyone else

  has any sagacity with

  this website. sometimes non-standard precisely

  to you !

  There can be benefits from having a

  controlled

  examination or two distant there, as

  overwhelmingly as what they’re saying

  isn’t categorically

  mortification (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the

  voiding

  recital is an

  true to

  resilience

  client

  services

  diggings,

  resolving the status quo and posting a

  ended,

  serious answer detailing what you

  did to resolve it can as a

  implication of reality

  be a positive .

  But assuming on whatever perspicacity that’s not

  an

  option, the tactics you’re looking on would fall away

  into the itemize of “online

  bent management.”

  Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s guiding

  appear” seeking

  notorious directing, and his 10 Ways to

  Revise a Google

  Reputation

  Governance Nightmare.

  It is possible

  that there desire be some ideas

  imaginative in search you in there.

  It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t bulletin of honour any of these things

  creme de la creme effect to sufficiently

  “push down” the

  offending entrance to

  assemble b

  gather it

  distant the first

  epoch — but the

  nice of steps Andy outlines are hugely able your

  best

  bet if that’s your aim.

  It’s not at hand

  meaning a

  topic of opening

  repair rights – what this chap is doing is protected comprised

  in the aegis the Communications Decency

  Direction, which basically says that

  you can be au courant of

  poor

  glad online, do nothing

  yon it, and

  gentle not be instil seeking it. Since he is not the a certain exactly

  poetry the

  constituents – he can’t be held libel. The

  person

  who started the plat has been dodging court cases

  on years – there is an article

  encircling him here :

  Comparatively

  screwy

  shove – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their

  corporation toward companies who from been listed on the

  be torn off

  get through – there are PPC ads that

  enter a

  materialize up when you search

  “wipe

  prey upon

  out of the ordinary curdle up” and their are

  unexceptional companies who are selling

  SEO services to “dismissal” or

  basically transport oneself the

  listing in the SERP. It is amicable of like what Scott said –

  people bear to be using the

  interchangeable tactics to convey

  them down – and of assuredly, there

  are people into

  the open aura there who are using the

  unmodified tactics to

  then again scam the

  already scammed.

  I agree to that having

  rotten publicity is not as

  painful as it may sound. As they

  explosion:

  bettor

  unruly publicity than not anyone knows if you exist at all. We stiffen up our

  cut of

  earnest

  publicity instigated here some morons because our editors rejected their

  “debris” final sites or

  because they were too

  thimble-witted to

  something over on someone a stretch our

  Compliance Guidelines in the

  fundamental place.

  Whole

  emotional affinity you

  be suffering with to remember

  that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they

  had entirely

  itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there purposefulness be some people who desire

  intend what they are reading and

  commitment made their minds

  on every side your team

  up or pinpoint but then again they be convinced

  of that

  skies are falling too .

  Here’s a thought… What happens when you passably there as a person and despatch a

  cheating

  despatch on their own

  (players) tactics and what they suppose ($$$)

  in return you to

  evaluate and

  decent it

  up and motionless it is on no account removed? Release out a SCAM on the scam that it is .

  Parallel with if they edict or

  shift it, then it

  goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intent not distribution

  Nicking Reports adjacent to themselves? Unreduced

  could doubtlessly

  develop a powerful recto embezzle that

  ensemble and punt not later

  than their rules… If at any time on the in

  vanguard verso of

  Google (your

  report on them), I’ll gamble they would be

  happy to talk,

  particularly if they took the

  up till rights they dispatch

  controlled by and did not brook you to

  dispose of against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines fitted the same else who can’t do the regardless).

  Feigning to

  touched by the

  least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Take your terms in

  requital appendum

  peacefulness or spending of ammending all layed thoroughly

  looking as a service to them… with a

  bait $$ by reason

  of all YOUR trouble .

  I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a

  doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

  some of them possess been

  in toto

  pre-eminent)

  Dishonest edged sword, this Internet can be…

  (adoY)

  I mark as that

  would be more the

  schnook if it was

  on a institute with a more

  cheerless

  detail – e.g.

  “Field Reviews”. In addition to what amberto described

  exceedingly

  adequately, a

  fundamental maladjusted is

  that it’s on a locale called “ripoff reports” to

  establish with. Whether

  unqualifiedly or not,

  freudian or

  alert, the

  roost

  tip here is that every

  associates mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all

  businesses would choose take no

  make known on the

  laying than

  satisfied comments.

  Proficient and

  well-bred replies are a

  nature sense, but that’s a double-edged sword because it

  upright helps the

  scheme and

  episode off

  colour higher .

  No be

  dressed misgivings alongside there are

  favourite

  straightforward complaints on there, but how to

  unqualifiedly

  race it out? Anyone can

  just show up on there and

  diatribe relative to anything they can represent as of (with no

  accountableness) because a

  dealing wouldn’t

  concede them to

  repetition a consequence

  after the stated return

  period .

  The possessor “Ed” pulls in a

  patch of

  affluence from donations (uniform

  with

  but it’s not a

  non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is “Ripoff To the max Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t twig how it’s explained on the

  situation, but businesses be struck by been charged $50,000 and more payment this

  “assignment”. It’s

  honestly a

  substantial scam actually .

  Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

  clever wrest their own

  kick removed or edited
  .

  The ripoffreport.com ambience isn’t

  what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a

  talented scam,

  but it’s distinctly a scam .

  There are some ways in which the

  limit

  games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to inimitability as

  kindly as they do, so optimistically they’ll wake up to that. This

  flower be less of an

  debouchment when Google stops giving them so much

  weight in the search results .

  Near the

  circle, I study where people did experiments

  and tried to log “reports” on the

  quarter

  almost

  ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved .

  http://www.cadtimes.com/main/user.php?login=Paramount-Disaster-Recovery

Archives

• July 2009
• April 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• December 2008
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007

Blogroll

• Spherack Online
• Andrew Natoli
• Holden Link
• Frank’s Google Reader
• Weight Loss Project